Monday, June 22, 2015

Balancing the Budget

Every so often a politician, lawyer, educator or just a plain ordinary citizen raises the question about having a Balanced Budget Amendment added to the Constitution.  Without any desire to demean their “good intentions”, logically, it doesn’t make sense.

Let’s start with the present facts concerning the operation of our Congress.  It has been called “dysfunctional”, “gridlocked” or even “useless”.  While some or more of such adjectives might apply at various times, they ignore some basic facts.
Congress has not abided by the Constitution for quite a few years.  Had they been paying attention and responding positively to their oath of office, they would have refused to allow the passage of a number of laws over the past century – not just the past decade or two.  To be specific, had they been “awake” in 1913, they never would have passed the Federal Reserve Act.  Nor would they have passed the “income tax law.” (XVI Amendment)  Or, they might have recognized the fundamental change in the structure of our government and discarded the XVII Amendment which turned the Senate into an elite House of Representatives.

All of which is to say that our elected representatives (whether House or Senate) have their own axes to grind and so long as they get re-elected each time, they ignore the wishes of their constituents.  After all, who are the voters but numbers with precious little influence for the most part.  All elected representatives excel in the area of counting – votes that is.  Perhaps Stalin was right when he said, “it matters not who votes.  It’s only important as to who counts the votes!”
Facing the facts, it does not appear that congress really pays much attention to the Constitution or even what they vote on, many acknowledging that they have not read the legislation before voting on it.  Thus, we must ask the question, “why does anyone honestly believe that a Balanced Budget Amendment” will result in a balanced budget?  It will be as easy to ignore such an amendment as it is the other limitations the Constitution imposes on the federal government.  Balancing the budget is something you do for your own family because you cannot live beyond your means for very long. 

That said, the average citizen today, if we are to believe the regularly printed statements considering their financial condition, has already stretched his or her indebtedness beyond recovery.  Individual bankruptcies are on the incline.  Has the citizen fallen under the belief that if government can “live by debt” then why can’t he or she?

Perhaps it is a result of the new math and the educators have found a way to make 2 + 2 equal 5 (when selling – it only equals 3 when buying).  In reality, that is exactly what has been happening as we print more and more fiat money.  With inflation, it deteriorates immediately after issuance and when “repaid” is done so with even cheaper money.

Balancing the budget doesn’t require a Constitutional Amendment.  It does, however, require some basic honesty and integrity on the part of our elected representatives and senators.  All that is required is a faithful adherence to the fundamental principles enshrined in the Constitution.  For example, let’s start with foreign aid.  Nowhere is it authorized so how can any congressman or woman in good conscience vote for foreign aid knowing that the US has to borrow the money in order to distribute it?  Going into debt in order to “give it away” borders on insanity.  It certainly is indicative of mental depravity.

That’s my view.  What’s yours?  Reach me at constititonviews@gmail.com ©Copyright 2015 Hillard W. Welch.